7 Comments
User's avatar
Kathleen McCook's avatar

I have experienced this, too. I know there are articles on a topic and then both G. and DDG give poor results-- Or structured results. And I have not seen any articles that address this shift. Our users may not realize this..or even remember that it was once otherwise. Excellent topic that needs exploration and--if I get time--some examples. Or perhaps others here have examples.

Expand full comment
S. Anderson's avatar

This is the type of topic our profession used to discuss but doesn't seem to anymore.

Expand full comment
Kathleen McCook's avatar

I know. We did once but the focus on book banning has overpowered observations about search engine results. I think we could have both.

Expand full comment
S. Anderson's avatar

I wonder if a new "Patriot Act" came along-- would the profession fight it?

Expand full comment
Kathleen McCook's avatar

Good question. I have been unable to get anyone interested in the Censorship Industrial Complex:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4XyIA3XqS8

Expand full comment
Oleg Kagan's avatar

I've been using Brave and DDG as my primary search engines for personal use for quite some time though I don't think they are any better at search then Google. In some cases, they are worse, but the privacy trade-offs count here. One thing that I had never considered was using boredom as a criteria, but you're absolutely right, Google results are boring. Content farms are so good at SEO that the algorithm and it's stewards can't compete.

Expand full comment
S. Anderson's avatar

I use Brave for privacy reasons as well if I am doing something beyond searching for directions or looking up the weather, but you are right, I don't find the results all that great and they are probably worse than Google. Back in the day Google used to offer up a lot more interesting links, it seems to me.

Expand full comment