“The days fast approach wherein erudition will only be discernible through an author's logic, deductive critical path, novel evidence, and heterodox thought - setting them apart from the ChatGPT zombie and its flawless grammar, punctuation, and pre-packaged information.”— twitter thread from Ethical Skeptic
Top image: Groupofzombiesjoelf.jpg/ Wikimedia Commons
I tried ChatGPT and found it awful. It also pulls incorrect citations and wrong information. If you ask something heterodox it won't respond. It also writes awful poems.
Over the last three months, colleagues from our editorial, creative, engineering, product, legal, commercial and partnerships teams have set up a Guardian AI working group to consider how we respond to these risks and opportunities and to draft a set of Guardian-wide AI principles. We’ve also been studying other media organisations’ statements and approaches with interest.
So it sounds like they will be using some AI generated text. Somehow this seems appropriate given the direction the mainstream media has been going in.
I tried ChatGPT and found it awful. It also pulls incorrect citations and wrong information. If you ask something heterodox it won't respond. It also writes awful poems.
Over the last three months, colleagues from our editorial, creative, engineering, product, legal, commercial and partnerships teams have set up a Guardian AI working group to consider how we respond to these risks and opportunities and to draft a set of Guardian-wide AI principles. We’ve also been studying other media organisations’ statements and approaches with interest.
https://www.theguardian.com/help/insideguardian/2023/jun/16/the-guardians-approach-to-generative-ai
sounds intriguing.
So it sounds like they will be using some AI generated text. Somehow this seems appropriate given the direction the mainstream media has been going in.
Yes, you had to sort of read between the lines, but you got it.